CAF Snubs Yassine Benzia’s Stunning Overhead Kick, Sparking Outrage and Criticism
The Confederation of African Football (CAF) has once again found itself at the heart of controversy after dismissing Yassine Benzia’s awe-inspiring overhead kick in favor of a far less ambitious goal during the CAF Awards ceremony. The Algerian international’s strike—an acrobatic masterpiece executed against South Africa in March, widely regarded as one of the most stunning goals of the year and shortlisted by FIFA for the prestigious Puskás Award—was astonishingly ignored, fueling widespread outrage among fans and observers alike.
In a decision that has baffled many and ignited an uproar, CAF instead crowned Angolan forward Mabululu’s goal from the Africa Cup of Nations (AFCON), a fine effort but one deemed by football enthusiasts as comparatively mundane. This controversial outcome has once again raised serious questions about the credibility, transparency, and fairness of CAF’s decision-making processes.
Benzia’s goal was not just a stroke of brilliance; it was a spectacle of technique, flair, and audacity. The Algerian forward orchestrated the moment single-handedly, expertly lifting the ball into the air before launching into a perfectly executed bicycle kick that sent the ball crashing into the back of the net. The strike drew global praise, hailed by pundits as a rare gem that encapsulates the artistry of football. Its omission from CAF’s awards, particularly in light of its recognition on the global stage by FIFA, has left many wondering whether CAF’s standards for excellence are aligned with the rest of the footballing world.
In stark contrast, Mabululu’s goal—though technically sound—lacked the ambition, innovation, and breathtaking quality that defined Benzia’s effort. Fans and analysts have been quick to point out the glaring disparity between the two, questioning the rationale behind CAF’s decision.
A Pattern of Controversy and Bias
This latest debacle is far from an isolated incident for CAF, whose credibility has been increasingly called into question in recent years. Just last year, the organization faced similar backlash after snubbing Riyad Mahrez, Algeria’s talisman, for the Best African Player award despite his exceptional season and undeniable contributions to both club and country. CAF’s repeated disregard for Algerian achievements, coupled with what many perceive as biased decision-making, has sparked anger among fans and fueled accusations of institutional prejudice.
Reacting to the snub, Yassine Benzia expressed his frustration in a sharp and sarcastic Instagram comment posted beneath CAF’s official announcement—a subtle but clear jab at the organization’s questionable judgment. His response resonated with legions of supporters, who flooded social media with messages of indignation, branding CAF’s decision as a blatant injustice.
“Benzia’s goal was a once-in-a-lifetime masterpiece,” wrote one supporter. “Ignoring it is not just an insult to him but an insult to football itself.” Others echoed similar sentiments, calling for greater accountability and transparency within CAF, an institution that continues to alienate its fanbase through controversial decisions.
A Tarnished Reputation
The uproar surrounding Benzia’s omission has amplified calls for reforms within CAF, which faces mounting criticism for its failure to uphold fairness and meritocracy. The organization’s inability to recognize and reward true excellence, particularly on a continent brimming with talent and passion for the sport, risks undermining its legitimacy on the global stage.
For Algerian fans and neutrals alike, the outcome of the CAF Awards stands as a stark reminder of the institution’s flawed priorities. Benzia’s bicycle kick—a dazzling display of skill and artistry—remains etched in the memories of those who witnessed it, an enduring symbol of what football represents at its finest. In contrast, CAF’s decision has left a stain on the awards ceremony, a glaring misstep that will not be easily forgotten.
